It appears brands have taken this strategy on in the digital age. Quite simply, newsjacking is when a brand publiclyshares their views about a current event in order to rack up some free attention for themselves. The ever popular example is Oreo's dunk in the dark tweet during the Super Bowl, but if you look closely, you will see newsjacking is all around.
![]() |
| Oreo's famous tweet from the 2013 Super Bowl |
This past June, the United States Supreme Court granted same sex couples equal rights and benefits under federal law bu striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This was an amazing day in our country's history, and people as well as brands took the opportunity to celebrate.
Wait. Were these brands celebrating, or attempting to get media coverage for themselves?
Take MasterCard for example, who shared their support on Twitter and offered incentives for those also sharing their support and engaging in the conversation:
Initially this brings warm and fuzzy feelings to see a brand being passionate about such a cause.
But then you learn that MasterCard also currently happened to be running a sweepstakes with the NYC Pride parade. Would they have been so verbal and trying to get so much attention if they did not have a current sweepstakes initiative?
Did it work? Of course it did, everyone was talking about DOMA that day on Twitter and saw MasterCard tweets. In addition, there is no question of whether MasterCard was loyal and supported gay marriage or not because they already had the sweepstakes running, so the brand appeared to be a truthful proponent. My inbox was flooded with advertising industry news about MasterCard's genius tweets, and many other news sources referenced its tweets that day. MasterCard definitely got some attention.
There is no doubt that newsjacking is effective. Brands get free press if they do it right (or possibly wrong), gain loyalists who also support the cause and have an opportunity to create content.
But, the tactic is new. Some brands haven't caught on. Will newsjacking have any worth when every brand is doing it for every big announcement? If the majority of brands newsjacked DOMA, would any journalists have bothered to write about MasterCard? Will it get to the point that brands aren't even really true or supportive of the news they are jacking because they are just trying to get attention?
Brands, don't be that friend.






